Where you go for construction robots.

RIC is where you go for construction robots. We score robot readiness by trade, grade the evidence behind every claim, and map subtask-level automation boundaries. So you can make decisions based on data, not demos.

Why is it easier to find honest reviews of a $500 drill than a $500,000 robot?

Contractors can't get structured, honest, trade-specific information about which robots actually work on their jobs. OEMs publish marketing. Trade media publishes hype. Nobody grades evidence quality or maps automation boundaries at subtask level.

RIC exists to close that gap. We break every construction job into its component subtasks and ask a simple question for each one: can a robot do this today, and what's the evidence? The answers aren't always what vendors want to hear but they're what contractors need before committing budget.

How We Score

Every job-robot pairing is assessed across nine axes grouped into three gates: Demand, Feasibility, and Economics at subtask level. Evidence is tiered from independent field data down to unverified vendor claims.

Editorial Standards & Principles

RIC maintains an editorial firewall between scoring and revenue. Manufacturers do not review assessments before publication. Paying for a verified profile does not change a score. Every evidence source is labeled as independent or vendor-supplied, and negative findings are published on the same timeline as positive ones.

Updates. Scores are refreshed when new evidence crosses the tier threshold.

Evidence over claims. A contractor deployment report is worth more than a vendor press release. We grade the evidence, not just the technology.

Independence is the product. We don't take manufacturer money to adjust scores. The methodology is public. The editorial firewall is real.

Scope

In Scope

  • Field-deployed construction robots with documented jobsite use
  • Autonomous and semi-autonomous systems performing physical trade work
  • Subtask-level automation within scored job types across all tracked trades
  • Evidence from contractors, third parties, and verified vendor sources

Out of Scope

  • Consumer or prosumer robotics hobby drones, consumer kits, and similar products outside commercial construction
  • Software only platforms BIM, project management, drone mapping, fleet tools. Included only when bundled as the control layer of a tracked robot.

If a category isn't on RIC, it's usually because the evidence doesn't yet meet our Tier B threshold.

Who It's For

Contractors

Structured, trade-specific intelligence to evaluate automation before committing budget.

Browse job profiles →

OEMs & Manufacturers

An independent profile that builds market credibility.

Analysts & Media

A citable, methodology-backed source for construction automation intelligence.

Pick your trade. See what's deployable.

Scored on field evidence, not vendor copy.